Evidence explorer
Every source that contributes to an interpretation, shown separately. VariantPulse does not collapse them into a single verdict.
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer · Hereditary cancer panel
Last evaluated 6 Nov 2025
Since the 2023 report, the consensus for BRCA1 c.5522G>T has moved from uncertain significance to likely pathogenic. That reading rests on 3 submissions at moderate review confidence — multiple submitters, no conflicts. That crosses the clinically actionable boundary, so management guidance issued on the original interpretation may no longer be the right guidance. 4 records on file carry this variant and have not yet been reassessed.
Composed from the structured fields of the records cited on this page. Requires clinical verification before it informs any decision.
Each source is shown as it reports itself. VariantPulse does not merge them into a single verdict.
| Source | Classification | Review level | Last updated | Strength | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ClinVar3 submissions on record. | Likely pathogenic | Multiple submitters, no conflicts | 6 Nov 2025 | Moderate2 of 4 review criteria met | VCV000869004 |
| Population frequencyHighest reported allele frequency carried on the source record. | Not reported | No frequency data | 6 Nov 2025 | Reference observation | |
| LiteraturePublications linked to this variant record. | 8 indexed publications | PubMed index | Latest 2021 | Supporting context | |
| Regional Evidence IndexModelled regional aggregation maintained inside this workspace | Pathogenic | 3 regional observations | 4 Mar 2026 | Cohort 5,400 | |
| This institutionThe interpretation issued to the patient at the time of testing. | Uncertain significance | Internal report | 18 Apr 2023 | On record |
Cited publications
Global
Read from ClinVar, which aggregates submissions dominated by European-ancestry cohorts.
Regional
Modelled regional aggregation maintained inside this workspace.
VariantPulse analysis
Both sources place this variant in the same band, so there is no divergence to resolve. Regional observations are limited but fall in the same clinical band as the global consensus. No divergence to resolve.